scharnhorst armor scheme

3 × 3 283 mm. The Scharnhorst-class was built with harder armor which accounted for 40% of the ship's weight. Officially Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were 'light battleships' but that is a unique class difficult to compare to other navies. The German ships were classed as Battleships carrying 9-11″ guns (some would classify them as Battlecruisers, smaller than a battleship) and the Alaska was classed as a. Diesel engines were considered but, with a massive power requirement to command the ships, there proved a need for superheated high pressure steam systems. Renown vs. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau in the action off Norway was roughly the same distance . Shells (for those who may not know . She is fairly resilient to incoming fire in most one-on-one situations, but . She may have been in standard Kriegsmarine greys, or she may have been wearing . She was launched on February 28th, 1940 and commissioned on November 4th, 1941. 283 mm/54.5 SK C/34 on a Drh LC/34 mount. The main modifications was the increase in AA, and a slightly revised armor scheme. Truth is the first victim of conflict. Very durable; her turtleback armor scheme means she is very hard to citadel when close. The bow section. What the Dutch lacked was a scheme for underwater protection; the Germans refused to share the details of Scharnhorst's armor below the water line. Like American fast battleships, however, the waterline citadel can be hit quite consistently if she is showing full broadside. Overall, the Richelieu class was very well protected with excellent protection above and below the water. Magni Apr 29, 2009: LOL, Scharnhorst pulling a full World of Warships routine there. Turret side armor and barbette armor would usually be hit at a more oblique angle, usually circa 30-45 degrees or more, though the very center of the barbette could be hit at near right angles. Her rudder shift is a strong 13.5s but her turning radius is a paltry 840m. Close. Bismarck's armor scheme and yaw.. It's not only German data. It was originally published in The Saturday Evening Post in 1944. 10 comments. 4 × 1 150 mm. The battlecruiser of 31,000 tons, nearly always operated with her sister ship "Gneisenau". While the game doesn't technically distinguish, Prinz Eitel Friedrich is a) a Mackensen-class battlecruiser, and b) kind of a turd (I have like a 63 percent WR in it, but am more than willing to attribute that to dumb luck. The Sinking of the Scharnhorst: A British Perspective. HMS hood had 5" upper belt, 7" middle and 12" top. Military Mashup Machine: With her high speed and maneuverability, torpedoes, and low number of guns, she can feel more like a heavy cruiser. Tirpitz armor scheme does not support you fighting from range and you are much more liable to take damage from plunging . Scharnhorst's armament consisted of 8 8.2-inch guns, 6 6-inch guns, and 20 24-pounders. The result was the armor scheme of the USS Nevada, which eschewed any medium protection in favor of a thicker belt, massive turret faces, and thicker turret tops and decks than contemporary practice. . The German pre-dreadnought Schleswig-Holstein signaled the start of the German assault on the Polish supply depot of Westerplatte by opening fire. Strabourg's armor system was specifically produced to defeat the German 11 inch gun. The upper belt is one example. FKS Typ 7 Mod. 23-24 March 1943: Operation Silesia.Tirpitz, Scharnhorst, Lützow and six . Scharnhorst. However, they lacked the underwater protection systems found on full-fledged battleships and even intermediate capital ships like the French Dunkerque and German Scharnhorst classes. Propulsion: 160,000 hp. You can still hit very hard but at ranges under, oh say 10kmish, unless your guns can overwatch that armor. 1. Just like most of the other battleship competition at the tier, Lenin handles weakly and tops out at a meager 28 knots. Good luck gettin through. Bismarck was a much evolved version of an armor scheme that WORKED. The precise colours of Scharnhorst at the time of her sinking by HMS Duke of York remain unknown. Named After Somebody Famous: August Neidhardt von Gneisenau, a prominent figure behind Napoleon's first defeat. Scharnhorst and Greisenau got 11 inch guns (as WWI German BCs had), but they were designed to carry 15 inchers (that were on short supply). Their armor scheme had sufficient gunfire protection the larger 11″ shells used by Germany's Deutschland-class "pocket battleships" and Scharnhorst. Re: Scharnhorst Class Specs: Armor Thickness Post by Herr Nilsson » Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:40 am Alberto Virtuani wrote: Do you think it was the same for the main turrets with the 60 mm upper deck extending around the barbette up to the sides of the ship (for around 6 meters on each side in case of "B" turret, less for "A" and "C") ? I was curious about Bretagne being classed as a BB yet being less heavily armoured than Hood, given that the criticism of Hood was that the ship was far too lightly armoured to take on a BB. About the only things Scharnhorst has to recommend itself are its own armor scheme and a marginal superiority in speed. I question if Project 1047 really was a copy of the Scharnhorst class, the Dutch managed to avoid most if not all of the pitfalls of standard German construction in the design. Although the USN had no idea what the protection was on the Scharnhorst class, the 12" gun was literally the perfect tool to defeat the armor scheme with the smallest caliber gun possible. I was only speaking about the armor scheme. As I have met him once and talked to him, well I listened most of the time actually, I know . Scharnhorst would have about 2" upper and 14" lower unsure which is middle. It is very close to the one of Scharnhorst but adds some extra. Initial design work for the Lions, the first post-Treaty British battleships, began in 1938 and envisioned a ship of 45,000-ton full load, armed with nine 16" guns in three triple turrets. Each ship had upper deck armor of 50 mm, 2″, but whereas Scharnhorst had a main armor deck of 20-50 mm , .8″-2″,with 105 mm , 4.1″ on the inclined portion, Continue Reading Sponsored by System1 | Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early symptoms of spinal muscular atrophy may surprise you. The Richelieu was supposed to have had 330mm belt armor although other parts of the armor scheme were thicker than the Germans. And note, I mean an actual battleship. The next step was the A-150 class. Lenin is a large ship. Unlike Hood, she shares the advanced armor scheme of Scharnhorst. An Ancient Facta non Verba. This was much deeper than contemporary ships like King George V (13.5′), Scharnhorst (16′), Iowa (17′), or Bismarck (20′). Battleship Bismarck & Her Armor Protection: The discovery by a deep-water remotely controlled submersible of the wreck of the German WWII battleship KM BISMARCK has renewed interest in that ship's capabilities vis-a-vis its battleship contemporaries in other navies at the time.This article is an analysis of the armor protection designed into this warship and its capabilities to inflict . It is interesting, as Friedman notes, that the USN took this step before the actions at Dogger Bank and Jutland made it clear that long-range . This sets Lenin up to be reasonably mediocre however she is unable to outrun most of her opposition. Exceptionally versatile. Alta is the farthest north genuine town on the planet so in July Kriegsmarine planners were facing a 23 hour day and the possibility of surface action between the Scharnhorst and destroyers against a British convoy bound to Murmansk (surprisingly close to Alta) so based a disruptive scheme on the Norwegian landscape. Odin is a German Tier VIII premium battleship, and takes the slot next to Tirpitz.. The ships would have made 28 knots, roughly the same speed at the King George V s but somewhat slower than extant British aircraft carriers, and considerably slower than the American Iowa class. The ships were intended to counter a perceived threat posed by Imperial Japanese aggression to the Dutch colonies in the East Indies. Scharnhorst was launched first, and is considered to be the lead ship by some sources; they are also referred to as the Gneisenau class in some other sources, as Gneisenau . The best way to get through higher german tier BBs is at range. Super Awesome Happy Funtime. In fact some aspects of Bismarcks' armor concepts are still classified today due to use in modern American carriers (blast control) Myth: Bismarck's armor is just the same as a WW1 Bayern class. The ships continued to use the so-called "all or nothing" armor scheme, which essentially had all of the ship's heavy armor protecting vital areas at the cost of leaving non-vital areas (like the bow and stern) very lightly armored. Bismarck and Scharnhorst had these distributed schemes for two main reasons, protection against smaller caliber shells and the extreme close range protection of the turtleback. The Scharnhorst finally turns and sinks at 7:45 pm just over 100 km north-northeast of North Cape, Norway. The secondary armament and armor scheme would have been similar to the King George V class, with dual-purpose 5.25" guns. This website uses cookies for functionality, analytics and advertising purposes as described in our, Alaska Class: Battlecruiser or Large Cruiser Semi-debate. On the assumption that her armouring scheme was designed to withstand the British 15" shell, one therefore needs to compare this venerable gun to the performance of the SKC/34 28cm fitted to the Scharnhorst to determine if the latter weapon was of sufficient power to deal with the Hoods defensive scheme adequately. The errors in the armor model for these two ships have been entirely compiled from a scan of the original armor scheme documentation, as well as the official Kriegsmarine immunity zone calculations in GKDS. her armor scheme was obsolete compared to that introduced by the Americans in the Nevada and subsequently adopted by virtually all warship designers. How to represent difference of Scharnhorst and Bismarck is a good question. 55 mins read. And the engineering plant popping through the armor deck was just plain stupid. The Scharnhorst and Gneisenau seem to have sacrificed only guns. share. If you spread armor out all over the ship, it is generally more durable against destroyer and light cruiser caliber weaponry, which would help in the commerce raiding . (The flag of German republics has been gold, black, and red.) WW2 Service History / Nationalism. The Scharnhorst twins' design prioritising armor and speed does kinda harken back to WWI-era german battles´cruisers, which likewise tended to sacrifice gun calibre and/or number for increased survivability when compared to their british counterparts. The ship's design in-game was actually a planned design for the Scharnhorst-class that would have replaced the SK C/34 guns with eight SK C/34 38cm guns; The same guns as on Bismarck and Tirpitz. 1 good hit from Hood and Scharnhorst is down for the count. If your armor scheme was all or nothing or a basic scheme you would be more vulnerable to secondary fire over other dreadnoughts. TiredOldSoldier, Sep 14, 2014. Despite being at the same tier as Tirpitz, Odin is better compared to Tier VII Scharnhorst due to their characteristics compared to same tier opponents.. Her main armament came from 15in turrets from the admiral-class battlecruisers HMS Indomitable, and HMS Invincible. Given the latter were almost considered battlecruisers, this tells volumes . The . While built as a replacement for the Howe, she never served as a fleet battleship, instead serving mainly as a carrier escort. Difference in broadside weight is great: 9 11 inchers 2700 kg, 6 15 inchers 4800 kg. Most things don't mention KGV's upper plating at all. ↳ The Ironclad & Pre-dreadnought Era (1860-1905), ↳ Movies, Films, Documentaries and Games. In this chart, that key characteristic is the one that historically most distinguished German battlecruisers from British ones: armor. another is the vertical Wh torpedo bulkhead extending all the way to the upper deck. In terms of armor, the King George V class ships were very well protected. Gneisanau, a Scharnhorst-class battleship, was a German battleship that participated during WWII. The RN 15"/45 879 pound APC shell would likewise defeat the Scharnhorst class' armor at all possible engagement ranges. G7a T1. Nine 305mm guns, distributed among three triple turrets, is comparable to supercruisers . #6. The German Scharnhorst class battleships were laid down in 1935, accompanied by the French Richelieu, also in 1935. The first in a series designed for modellers, this is a complete guide to the battleship "Scharnhorst", from original ship to detailed model. Highly versatile battleship; her armament allows her to . 1. With no experience in building heavy warships, having skipped the dreadnought age, the Dutch cast about helplessly for assistance, finally scoring a technical visit to Italy's Ansaldo yards. Using face-hardened armor to destroy the shell was more effective in these areas. FKS Typ 7 Mod. The debate about battlecruisers usually says they sacrificed both guns and armor for speed. Assume each fleet had six destroyers as escorts. Design 1047, also known as Project 1047, was a series of plans for a class of Dutch battlecruisers prior to the Second World War. Best, ~D, the EviL I think this one would have come down to which one drew blood first. The main armament of Odin is very small for a battleship at that tier.

Sweetwater Credit Score, Black Riding Boots Women's, Carl Maddox Field House Address, Friendship Activities Middle School, Frozen Cauliflower Tots, Old Spice Fresh Aftershave Discontinued, Chocolate Basil Cookies, Body Language Reading Comprehension Pdf, Lie-nielsen Planes In Stock, Cherokee Casino Bus Trips From Charlotte, Massachusetts Gaming Commission Salaries, Ncsu Internships Abroad,